Recession Risk Score
The probability is a secondary output that is not validated to beat the base rate under point-in-time data; it is hidden by default. The regime frequency is a descriptive statistic over 281 scored months, Mar 2002 – Aug 2025 — not a probability. See methodology.
Score history — walk-forward validation record (Dec 1997 – Aug 2025), then live publication
What is moving the score · inputs as of
Bars show each input's contribution to the model's log-odds of recession (right = raising risk, left = lowering it), with the input's current reading. Contributions describe the model, not the economy: strong payroll growth raises modelled risk in this specification (a late-cycle effect).
Market Stress Monitor
| Input | Reading | Percentile |
|---|
The Drawdown Monitor is an analytical composite, not a statistically validated probability or forecast of future market declines. Describes current market conditions. No tested model forecast market declines reliably under point-in-time validation. Credit stress (EBP) is shown as published and is not point-in-time.
Validation record — point-in-time
| Recession | Run-up months in High | Months in Elevated or above |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2001 – Nov 2001 | run-up partly outside the validation window; lead not measured | |
| Jan 2008 – Jun 2009 | 12 / 12 | 12 / 12 |
| Mar 2020 – Apr 2020 | 1 / 12 | 10 / 12 |
| Regime | Months | Recession within 12 months |
|---|
The regime table is computed from the published record at load time over the 281 months that carry a score (the percentile score needs a 40-month warm-up; AUROC is computed on all 332 raw outputs from Dec 1997). Same window on today's revised data scores 0.92 — the difference is the cost of data revisions in a conventional backtest, and is why the lower figure is the one reported. Live publication began September 2026; the record before that is a walk-forward simulation on archived vintages. The full series: oos_record.csv.
Known limitations
The point-in-time validation window contains three recession cycles. Performance estimates carry substantial uncertainty and no claim of consistent lead time is supportable.